Sunday, 3 July 2016

The divergent views of lawyers on Ikpeazu ,Ogah



All may not have been heard of the surprise sack of Abia State governor, Okezie Ikpeazu and the issuance of certificate of return to Samson Ogah.
 
Ogah

Lawyers have  disagreed on whether the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) was right to issue a Certificate of Return to Samson Ogah following a court order that Dr. Okezie Ikpeazu vacate Office as Abia State Governor.

INEC’s  National Commissioner (Southeast) Lawrence Nwuruku issued the certificate despite notice of appeal for stay of the orders made by Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court, Abuja filed on Tuesday by Ikpeazu.


According Senior advocates Chief Felix Fagbohungbe if Ikpeazu’s notice of appeal was accompanied by a motion for stay of execution, then the Certificate of Return issued to Ogah was in error.

“An appeal does not operate as a stay. That is the law. Ikpeazu’s lawyers should know that immediately they file the notice of appeal, they must also simultaneously file a notice for stay of execution of the judgment. Once they have done this, INEC should not do anything but allow Ikpeazu to pursue his appeal.

Chief Emeka Ngige reasoned that INEC would be right in issuing Ogah the certificate of return if Ikpeazu had failed to serve it with his motion for stay of execution.

“If the notice of appeal coupled with a motion for stay of execution of the judgment either at the Federal High Court or at the Court of Appeal had not been duly served on INEC, the issuance of the certificate of return would seem to be in order. If otherwise, then it would be wrong.
“So, the question is: ‘Has Dr. Ikpeazu served both processes on INEC? Is there proof of service?’ If yes, the court can set aside the Certificate of Return the INEC issued to Mr. Ogah.”

Read Morehttps://us-mg6.mail.yahoo.com/neo/launch?.rand=6his0qh46eve6#2345957826

No comments:

Post a Comment